汉学研究的主体性

黎建球
天主教辅仁大学

主体性的研究自文艺复兴以来就已蔚为风气，但在汉学研究中的主体性却和传统的主体性大相径庭。

传统的主体性研究一般是以自我为中心并以一切归于自我为目的，而汉学研究中的主体性则是以研究主体为对象，并以研究主体为结论。其说有三：

一、汉学研究的主体是以有中国或中华民族以来所产生的人地事为其内容。

二、是在此的基础上的相关诠释或解析。

三、是在此基础上的创发或演绎。

基于此，汉学研究是一个目的，但是，晚近的汉学研究却将此视为工具，以之作其他的用处，从而失去了汉学研究的主体性，造成了价值的失衡和目的的丧失。本文将藉此说明汉学研究中主体性的意义与价值。  

The Subjectivity of Sinological Studies

Li Bernard
Fu Jen Catholic University

Although studies on subjectivity have prevailed since the Renaissance, the subjectivity of sinological studies differs greatly from the traditional approach.  Generally speaking, traditional subjectivity studies focus on the “self,” and try to achieve the goal of integrating the whole into the individual “self.” However, the subjectivity of sinological studies regards subjectivity as the object, and further concludes everything with this subjectivity. Here are three arguments:

The contents of sinological subjectivity are subjects that originated in China or are from Chinese peoples.

They are relevant interpretations or analyses based on the concept.

They are creations or deductions based on the concept.

According to what has been mentioned, sinology is a goal. But recently, it, with the loss of subjectivity, is the means for other purposes. This makes the value of sinology unbalanced and its goals aimless. In this paper, I will argue about the value and significance of sinological studies.